I found it very interesting how the readings connected the
aggressive fitness culture of the 80s and the more laidback body image of the
90s to political climates of the times. In Dyer’s reading, he mentions Bryan S.
Turner’s concept of a “somatic society” in which “major political problems are
both problematized in the body and expressed through it” (183). The 80s were
very rigid with Reagan cracking down on things like drug use and promoting
healthy, acclimated living. One of the major political problems of the 80s was
the war on drugs. This seems almost ironic given the bodies shown on TV. Though it’s unfair to assume stars like
Patrick Schwarzenegger used steroids or other performance enhancers, promoting
images of men like that on screen definitely led to interest and use of such
drugs. The image of the virile, overly muscular man as “physical perfection”
promoted drug use just as Reagan was trying to eliminate it. In this way, “the
major political problem” (drugs) was “expressed through the body”. Ways in
which “the major political problem” was “problematized in the body” is also
(and oppositely) through the perfection of bodies on screen, however. Men and
women could see these perfect figures on screen (less of a Schwarzenegger, more
of a Jamie Lee Curtis) and be turned off of drugs in order to reach that
perfection. Drugs became the problem. The assumption, in this case, is that you
can only achieve such perfection through healthy living, and that healthy
living means abstinence from drugs. Whether or not this myth was/is true, it
seemed to work in getting everyone into a major health craze throughout the
decade. When I see bodies from the 80s, in movies, ads, etc. I am literally awestruck
at the physical perfection of every single person. At first, it seems admirable
until you think more deeply what a rigid society would give way to such
perfection.
No comments:
Post a Comment